Spektra Halo "Non Adjustable" Poll

[No Iron Machines]

the main difference is the COST OF PRODUCTION, no GIVE cost less, this why GASTON offer a cheap price on this NO GIVE, i think is good idea the same MACHINE available HIVE SYSTEM or NO GIVE.....IS COOL

AGGREE WITH THAT IDEA 100%

[MickWrath]

the main difference is the COST OF PRODUCTION, no GIVE cost less, this why GASTON offer a cheap price on this NO GIVE, i think is good idea the same MACHINE available HIVE SYSTEM or NO GIVE.....IS COOL

AGGREE WITH THAT IDEA 100%

We already established this in Gastons initial post, and why the Caps? We all get this homie it doesn't need to be repeated in Caps. If it's the same operation and function then it will be good for new customers who don't have a halo and want a choice, but if this is the case it does nothing for existing halo owners because obviously we could just tighten the give knob down. Perhaps the question isn't being answered because its premature and the machine has not been built yet to know if it will function the same or different. Pertaining to the vortex the cam switch is only one screw so I don't see it being a big deal as long as there is a body/cam combo as well as a complete machine. I'd like to see this over a modified halo for non adjustment if the operating system is the same as the give knob tightened down. New machines and new operating systems is what we are all really waiting for.